Anticipating your grumblings (although I’m sure not about OVAC shows, ha), I wanted to write a bit about the practical and philosophical reasoning behind some of these rules. Usually, juried show rules have their basis in some administrative need or effort toward fairness. I can only speak to the process of OVAC exhibitions, but imagine many organizers have similar reasoning.
Assumption #2: Make process as fair as possible
Philosophical: We know that any competition has criteria. In the case of a
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj1tLHf-dudtd8FiH38ibqHzq6bZ6AbVMuevEzA23RAOYvsN2gOdgsj2JD4GQj4H0uABdniRtZDu31JXankPlbJpqH2nm1KQ9Ooj-C4JaLYr1w83zjg5S-BO1kOov3bYusnKZ9U68uP0Jz7/s400/curators.jpg)
Practical: The curators always spend time with the work – looking at it and trying to understand it. We try to make the process as fair as possible, giving each artist an equal opportunity to be seen. This is why we set a limit to number of artworks entered and images of each piece. If one artist had five images of a sculpture, while another artist only two, we know one artist would be seen more by the curator than the other. Likewise, if one artist’s proposal is 700 words and another 200, the first artist gets more space to explain the project to the curator. We also spell out exactly what artists can submit. For instance, if sketches are welcome, we say so. We set maximum limits of images, words or page count and are explicit about allowable elements to even equalize what the curator sees.
The Oklahoma Visual Arts Coalition will offer the workshop “Jury Duty: Entering Juried Shows & Competitions”on Thursday, December 10, 2009, 5:30-7:30pm at the Price Tower Arts Center in Bartlesville.
Caption: Momentum OKC 2009 curators Heather Ahtone & Romy Owens carefully reviewing digital submissions.
No comments:
Post a Comment